|
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
February 2005
|
|
It is likely that some of the apparent increase in cases, particularly in older individuals, from whom isolation of the organism is more difficult, may be due to the increased popularity of serologic tests. These have become more popular coincident with the rise in incidence during the past decade. The increase in reported cases in older individuals has been weighted by the reporting from a few states, at least one of which has relied heavily on serologic diagnosis (J Infect Dis. 1999;28:1230).
Despite the caveat about relying on antibody measurements, some have used these to promote particular pertussis vaccines over others. The FDA, in a letter to all vaccine manufacturers in 1998, has warned that there are no clinical data on file that would support any claim or suggestion of clinical superiority or benefit regarding the numbers of combinations of pertussis antigens contained in the DTaP vaccines. Serologic data have been used to support the use of booster doses in adolescents (J Infect Dis. 2004;190:535), although the licensure of the acellular pertussis vaccines had been based on clinical trials because of the lack of serologic correlates of protection. Several other countries have adolescent pertussis immunization programs, and perhaps, it would be prudent to just wait and see what is accomplished in these countries.
It is unclear if protection would be conferred on adolescent vaccinees or the duration of such protection and how much would be conferred on their babies. Based on serologic studies, it is estimated that immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody will remain above threshold for four to 13 years. It appears, however, that this threshold is defined as the lower limit of the precision of the assay rather than the protective titer (J Infect Dis. 2004;190:535). IgG antibody is transmitted to infants, but how much protection this would confer in actual terms, given the uncertainty about the protective effects of various antibodies, the persistence of passively acquired antibody and the levels of maternal antibody at the time of gestation, are all unknown.
It is important that we address the problem of adolescent health care. There are vaccines that may be useful in this group, including those against meningococci, human papillomaviruses and pertussis. Immunization of babies has been credited by some as bringing them into the medical care system, and perhaps, this can be accomplished for adolescents. We certainly can do a better job of addressing the health problems of this group than we are doing at the present time. Finally, it may be a propitious time for vaccine producers to develop a better pertussis vaccine than we now have rather than trying to repackage the existing vaccine. Of the components of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine, the latter has done the least to eliminate disease. Alternative approaches using existing vaccines, eg immunization of adolescents, pregnant woman or newborns, have their proponents, but all have significant drawbacks.
For more information:
- Purdy KW, Hay JW, Botteman MF, Ward JI. Evaluation of strategies for use of acellular pertussis vaccine in adolescents and adults: a cost-benefit analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:20-28.
- Tanaka M, Vitek CR, Pascual FB. Trends in pertussis among infants in the United States, 1980-1999. JAMA. 2003;290:2968-2975.
- Balcewicz-Sablinska MK, Gan H, Remold HG. Interleukin 10 produced by macrophages inoculated with Mycobacterium avium attenuates mycobacteria-induced apoptosis by reduction of TNF-alpha activity. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1230-1237.
- Vandelaer J, Birmingham M, Gasse F, et al. Tetanus in developing countries: an update on the Maternal and Neonatal Tetanus Elimination Initiative. Vaccine. 2003;21:3442-3445.
- Le T, Cherry JD, Chang SJ, et al. Immune responses and antibody decay after immunization of adolescents and adults with an acellular pertussis vaccine: the APERT Study. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:535-544.
![]()