|
July 2005
| |
![Philip A. Brunell, MD [photo]](../art/brunell_sm.jpg) Philip A. Brunell
|
How is conjunctivitis transmitted? In some cases it is quite
obvious. When a baby with gingivostomatitis comes in with a red eye, or a baby
develops a purulent conjunctivitis a few days postpartum, these clearly are
from direct introduction of the organism into the eye. When a child comes in
with acute otitis media (AOM) or pharyngitis, we recognize a common organism
causes both but how did they get from the middle ear or the pharynx
respectively to the eye? We recognize the frequent concurrence of otitis and
conjunctivitis. However, so often the identical species of bacterium causes one
or the other or simply resides in the upper respiratory tract causing neither.
These may seem trivial questions but to control the spread of conjunctivitis,
we must understand how it spreads.
It is generally accepted that conjunctivitis is a very contagious
condition. I asked a good friend of mine who had spent many years in the school
system how often she had observed classroom epidemics. She responded that they
do not occur because the children are excluded as soon as they are found to be
affected. This might be somewhat effective in the case of adenovirus
conjunctivitis, which usually is accompanied by pharyngitis. How it might
impact bacterial conjunctivitis is problematic. Yet do not try to argue with a
school nurse about exclusion of children with conjunctivitis or when they can
be considered noncontagious and return to school. Most species of the bacteria
that cause conjunctivitis can be found in the respiratory secretions of almost
all children, sick or well. However, there have been reports in the literature
of a strain that was capable of causing wider-spread conjunctivitis.
![[bar]](../art/gradient.gif) Lessons learned
During the past few years, we have had reports of outbreaks of
conjunctivitis among college students, recruits and elementary school pupils
(MMWR. 2003;52[4]:64-66). These outbreaks were so unusual that
they were reported in the medical literature. My educator friend was correct:
classroom spread is unusual. What made these outbreaks special is that they
were caused by pneumococci that produced similar patterns on pulse gel
electrophoresis, one that in addition was unencapsulated. What did we learn
about how conjunctivitis is spread? As one might have guessed, close contact
increased likelihood of spread. Attack rates were higher in classmates and
somewhat lower in staff and household contacts. There was relatively little
spread to the rest of the community.
What appears to be common to all of these outbreaks was the
uncertain effect of measures designed to limit spread.
The effectiveness of prevention measures for interrupting
the transmission of conjunctivitis is not known, researchers noted.
Teachers reported that encouraging increased hand washing was disruptive.
Children were excluded an average of two days but admittedly the effectiveness
of this measure was difficult to assess. Although antimicrobial eye drops are
commonly prescribed, their effect on decreasing spread is unknown. The
Red Book states that children can be sent back to school after therapy
is initiated. It does not state whether the recommended therapy should be the
over-the-counter medication that retails at $5 a pop or some of the newer ones
that retail at $100.
There is evidence that bacterial sterilization of the conjunctivae
is achieved more rapidly with antibiotic drops than with placebo. How this
translates into communicability is unclear. Antibiotics also hasten the
resolution of symptoms but some asymptomatic eyes still harbored organisms and
others that were still inflamed were sterile (J Pediatr.
1984;104:623).
Thus the decision as to when children should be allowed to return
to school is still moot. If one adds up the number of days of parental loss of
wages due to the exclusion policy, it would probably be a considerable sum.
Certainly children should not be made to attend school if they are too
uncomfortable to do so, but keeping them out when the chances of spreading even
a highly epidemic strain is less than one in three should make us stop and
think. |